News you can use...or at least we can make you laugh.
View this email in your browser


Collecting Arrears and Cutting Costs in the COVID-19 Era

Massive business closings, layoffs and furloughs have rendered many co-op shareholders and condo unit owners unable to pay their mortgage as well as their maintenance or common charges. This diminished income stream places great stress on co-ops and condos, which have financial obligations of their own, including (but not limited to) insurance premiums, payroll, utilities, and in the case of co-ops, mortgage payments and real estate taxes, just to name a few.
Normally, co-ops would resort to serving rent demands and prosecuting nonpayment proceedings in housing court, and condos would commence foreclosure actions to collect arrears from defaulting unit owners. However, given the humanitarian demands of the moment — not to mention the effective closure of the court system and the moratorium on foreclosure auctions and evictions for the foreseeable future — co-ops and condos must resort to alternative methods for collecting arrears and maintaining their financial stability during this crisis.
But, given the reality at hand, it is important to remember that condo and co-op boards have fiduciary obligations to their associations and corporations and therefore cannot waive or discharge the financial obligations of their members, since doing so would result in shortfalls that would have to be made up by the non-defaulting unit owners. However, a balanced, multi-faceted and holistic approach can and should be taken to address this issue, both globally and on a case-by-case basis.
1. Individual Unit Owners
When individual unit owners fall behind on their maintenance/common charge payments, typically a predicate letter is sent before formal legal proceedings are commenced. This practice should not change so that a record is made that the unit owner is in default, and payment is due. However, this letter should be tailored to the present situation, and should invite the defaulting unit owners to contact management as soon as possible to explain and document their individual circumstance, and to propose a payment plan.
It is up to boards to determine whether or not they will require the defaulting unit owner to provide actual proof of financial hardship (e.g., unemployment, diminished income), or to simply provide a payment plan to anyone who requests it. Imposing standards for qualifying for a payment plan creates an administrative burden on the board or its managing agent. On the other hand, simply allowing anyone who requests a temporary suspension of payment obligations may create a greater short-term deficit that will have to be addressed.
Our recommendation is to enter into an out-of-court agreement, comparable to forbearance agreements utilized by banks. Generally, in the agreement, the unit owner acknowledges the amount owed and is granted a three-month suspension on monthly carrying charges, at which point the owner will resume making monthly payments when due, plus an additional sum toward the balance owed until paid in full. The exact terms can be negotiated or tailored on a case-by-case basis, but we recommend that the balance be paid off within one year. Importantly, it must be understood and agreed that the obligation to pay arrears is only deferred, not waived.
As an incentive, waive all legal fees, interest and late charges, but only if payment obligations are met.
If there is a default, the co-op or condo won’t be able to enforce the agreement in court until the court system is reopened. And even then, there will likely be a large logjam that will make enforcement a lengthy process. But the process will be relatively smooth, since the defaulting unit owner will have already acknowledged the debt in the agreement, making ultimate collection of the debt inevitable.
2. Commercial Tenants
Many co-op buildings have commercial tenants that are similarly unable to meet their rent obligations as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
While, in principle, boards may wish to enter into comparable rent-deferral agreements with its commercial tenants, we recommend that requests be more strenuously vetted. Specifically, the financial health of the tenant should be thoroughly assessed, so a determination can be made as to the likelihood of the tenant surviving this crisis or filing for bankruptcy protection.
To that end, the type of security deposit should be reviewed, since its recovery by the co-op (the landlord) may be difficult if the tenant files for bankruptcy. For example, although letters of credit issued by third parties can be drawn down by the landlord and fall outside bankruptcy proceedings, security deposits may not be touched without court approval. Therefore, in the event of a default, it may be advisable to apply the security deposit toward arrears as soon as possible. Note further that payments made toward arrears on account of “unsecured” obligations may be vulnerable to recoupment by the debtor’s estate if applied within 90 days prior to the date the bankruptcy petition is filed.
Most commercial leases are secured by a personal guaranty, so any agreement can and should be conditioned upon the guarantor’s express acknowledgement of their obligation to satisfy the arrears.
Obtaining updated financial information from the guarantor is also recommended.
Another consideration is whether or not the tenant has business interruption insurance that covers the COVID-19 pandemic. Today, insurance companies are almost universally rejecting these claims on the basis that the virus does not cause “property damage,” which is a common requisite for coverage. However, this issue is unresolved, and will likely only be settled by the courts or government action (see articles written by my colleagues Finley Harckham and Rhonda Orin et al. on insurance companies’ overly broad assertions of no coverage for such losses). That said, tenants should be required to at least file claims or put their carriers on notice as a condition of entering into an agreement with the co-op.
The board can also demand, as a condition of entering into any such agreement, that the tenant obtain a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan or Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) (or provide proof that it sought one and the application was denied), or state why it does not qualify for these types of loans.
Finally, since agreements with commercial tenants regarding rent payments are, in fact, lease modifications, a review of the underlying co-op mortgage by legal counsel is essential because lease modifications may require consent from the bank holding the mortgage on the building. Generally, a lender will require that it approve any rentdeferment, reduction or abatement agreements, and failing to do so may trigger a default.
3. Cost-Cutting Measures
In order to meet their own financial obligations, co-op and condo boards can negotiate payment plans with their own vendors, banks and utility providers. They may also engage in cost-cutting measures, such as suspending unnecessary amenities that require staffing resources, and delaying nonessential and discretionary capital improvement projects.
If the financial situation is dire, boards can also seek to refinance existing mortgages, tap into their lines of credit, or even enter into loan agreements with unit owners who are financially equipped to do so.
4. Insurance
Co-ops and condos should have their own insurance policies extensively reviewed by legal counsel to determine if there is coverage for lost income under business interruption or related coverage. Even if it appears that the policy does not cover this type of event, or if it contains a potentially applicable exclusion, the carrier should promptly be placed on notice to preserve the claim. Imperfect, even premature notice is better than late notice or no notice. In some instances, coverage can be adversely affected by late notice.
Formulating the best strategy for collecting arrears and maintaining the financial health of your co-op or condo in this challenging environment requires a review of the building’s governing documents, leases and insurance policies. We welcome the opportunity to address each board’s unique circumstances, so that the best outcome can be achieved. 

Andrew J. Wagner

Anderson Kill’s Co-op, Condo & Real Estate Advisor is published periodically to inform clients, friends, and fellow professionals of developments in cooperative, condominium and real estate law. This publication was prepared by Anderson Kill P.C. to provide information of interest to readers. Distribution of this publication does not establish an attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Future developments may supersede this information.

Reprinted with permission by Anderson Kill

Forward Forward
Tweet Tweet
Share Share

The funny quotes here are allegedly real true funny extracts from courtrooms. The questions are from lawyers; the answers are from witnesses.

Q: "The truth of the matter is that you were not an unbiased, objective witness, isn't it? You too were shot in the fracas."

A: "No, sir. I was shot midway between the fracas and the naval."

Q: What is your date of birth?

A: July fifteenth.

Q: What year?

A: Every year.

Q: What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?

A: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.

Q: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?

A: Yes.

Q: And in what ways does it affect your memory?

A: I forget.

Q: You forget. Can you give us an example of something that you've forgotten?

Q: How old is your son, the one living with you?

A: Thirty-eight or thirty-five, I can't remember which.

Q: How long has he lived with you?

A: Forty-five years.

Q: What was the first thing your husband said to you when he woke up that morning?

A: He said, "Where am I, Cathy?"

Q: And why did that upset you?

A: My name is Susan.

Q: Do you know if your daughter has ever been involved in voodoo or the occult?

A: We both do.

Q: Voodoo?

A: We do.

Q: You do?

A: Yes, voodoo.

Q: Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?

Q: The youngest son, the twenty-year old, how old is he?

Q: Were you present when your picture was taken?

Q: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?

A: Yes.

Q: And what were you doing at that time?

Q: She had three children, right?

A: Yes.

Q: How many were boys?

A: None.

Q: Were there any girls?

Q: How was your first marriage terminated?

A: By death.

Q: And by whose death was it terminated?

Q: Can you describe the individual?

A: He was about medium height and had a beard.

Q: Was this a male, or a female?

Q: Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?

A: All my autopsies are performed on dead people.

Q: All your responses must be oral, OK? What school did you go to?

A: Oral.

Q: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?

A: The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m.

Q: And Mr Dennington was dead at the time?

A: No, he was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an autopsy.

Q: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?

Q: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?

A: No.

Q: Did you check for blood pressure?

A: No.

Q: Did you check for breathing?

A: No.

Q: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?

A: No.

Q: How can you be so sure, Doctor?

A: Because his brain was sitting on my desk, in a jar.

Q: But could the patient have still been alive, never the less?

A: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practising law somewhere.

We provide the subject matter expertise and expert testimony indispensable to successfully litigating complex cases, civil and criminal,  involving  a diverse range of issues relating directly or indirectly to real property or interests in real property. 

We support your litigation from the beginning with thorough research by experienced investigators, following through with expertly developed reports and culminating in confident data driven supportable and credible expert testimony. 

We bring the same thoroughness and meticulous research and preparation to real property related valuation based tax issues. We also bring the same thoroughly researched data driven approach to  zoning  applications and   land use issues. 

Visit us online or contact us to find out more about our services.
We are seeking submissions.  If you would like to write the feature article in a future edition, please read our submission instructions and editorial guidelines.

If you have a case you  think is important or interesting we would be glad to post it on our web site (where it would also be archived). We will credit you for the submission.  Please send it to us.
Forward Forward
Tweet Tweet
Share Share
5 Latonia Road
Rye Brook, NY 10573

    Copyright © 2020 | Real Estate Solutions |, All rights reserved. 

    subscription preferences